Copper Sands Homeowners Assoc. v. Dist. Ct. (Murchison & Cumming) ( 2013 )

 Game Tech., Inc. v. Second Judicial Dist. Court, 124 Nev. 193, 197, 179
P.3d 556, 558 (2008) (citations omitted); see NRS 34.160. It is within this
court's discretion to determine whether a writ petition will be considered.
Smith v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court, 107 Nev. 674, 677, 818 P.2d 849, 851
(1991). Petitioners bear the burden of demonstrating that this court's
extraordinary intervention is warranted. Pan v. Eighth Judicial Dist.
Court, 120 Nev. 222, 228, 88 P.3d 840, 844 (2004). Writ relief is generally
available, however, only when there is no plain, speedy, and adequate
remedy in the ordinary course of law. NRS 34.170. Moreover, this court
has held that the right to appeal is typically an adequate legal remedy
precluding writ relief. Pan, 120 Nev. at 224, 88 P.3d at 841.
Having considered the petition and appendix filed in this
matter, we conclude that petitioners have not demonstrated that our
intervention by way of extraordinary relief is warranted. NRAP 21(b)(1),
Smith, 107 Nev. at 677, 818 P.2d at 851. Accordingly, we
ORDER the petition DENIED.
cc: Hon. Joanna Kishner, District Judge
Law Offices of Terry L. Wike
Murchison & Cumming, LLC/Las Vegas
Eighth District Court Clerk
SUPREME COURT
OF
NEVADA
2
(0) 1947A