Martinez (Michael) v. State ( 2014 )


Menu:
  •                 prove ineffective assistance of appellate counsel, a petitioner must
    demonstrate that counsel's performance was deficient in that it fell below
    an objective standard of reasonableness, and resulting prejudice such that
    the omitted issue would have a reasonable probability of success on
    appeal. Kirksey, 112 Nev. at 998, 923 P.2d at 1114. Both components of
    the inquiry must be shown. Strickland v. Washington, 
    466 U.S. 668
    , 697
    (1984). We give deference to the court's factual findings if supported by
    substantial evidence and not clearly erroneous but review the court's
    application of the law to those facts de novo.     Lader v. Warden, 
    121 Nev. 682
    , 686, 
    120 P.3d 1164
    , 1166 (2005).
    First, appellant claimed that trial counsel was ineffective for
    failing to argue at sentencing for a reduced sentence and for failing to
    fight the deadly weapon enhancement. Appellant failed to demonstrate
    that trial counsel was deficient or that he was prejudiced. Appellant's
    claim regarding the failure to argue at sentencing for a reduced sentence
    is belied by the record. Trial counsel filed a sentencing memorandum,
    presented mitigation evidence, and asked for probation. As to appellant's
    claim regarding the deadly weapon enhancement, appellant failed to
    demonstrate specific facts that, if true, would entitle him to relief.
    Hargrove v. State, 
    100 Nev. 498
    , 502-03, 
    686 P.2d 222
    , 225 (1984).
    Appellant pleaded guilty to voluntary manslaughter with use of a deadly
    weapon and he failed to provide any argument as to how trial counsel
    could have fought the enhancement. Therefore, the district court did not
    err in denying this claim.
    Next, appellant claimed that appellate counsel was ineffective
    for failing to raise appropriate issues on appeal. Appellant failed to
    support this claim with specific facts that, if true, entitled him to relief, id,
    SUPREME COURT
    OF
    NEVADA
    2
    (0) 1947A
    because he failed to allege what claims appellate counsel should have
    raised. Therefore, the district court did not err in denying this claim.
    Accordingly, we
    ORDER the judgment of the district court AFFIRMED.
    p
    J.
    Pickeri Pleb
    J.
    Parraguirrr sm7
    aka e
    cc: Hon. Jessie Elizabeth Walsh, District Judge
    Michael Martinez
    Attorney General/Carson City
    Clark County District Attorney
    Eighth District Court Clerk
    SUPREME COURT
    OF
    NEVADA
    3
    (0) 1947A    se
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 64648

Filed Date: 4/10/2014

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 10/30/2014