Pletcher v. Dist. Ct. (Boulevard Theater, LLC) ( 2014 )

 NRS 34.160; Int? Game Tech., Inc. v. Second Judicial Dist. Court, 124
Nev. 193, 197, 179 P.3d 556, 558 (2008). Writ relief is typically not
available, however, when the petitioner has a plain, speedy, and adequate
remedy at law. See NRS 34.170; NRS 34.330; Int? Game Tech., 124 Nev.
at 197, 179 P.3d at 558. Generally, an appeal is an adequate legal remedy
precluding writ relief. Pan v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court, 120 Nev. 222,
224, 88 P.3d 840, 841 (2004).
Having considered the petition and its attachments, we
conclude that our intervention by way of extraordinary writ relief is not
warranted, as petitioner has an adequate legal remedy in that, once a
final judgment resolving all of the claims in the underlying case has been
entered, see Lee v. GNLV Corp., 116 Nev. 424, 426, 996 P.2d 416, 417
(2000) (clarifying that "a final judgment is one that disposes of all the
issues presented in the case, and leaves nothing for the future
consideration of the court, except for post-judgment issues such as
attorney's fees and costs"), he may appeal from that judgment to the
extent that he is aggrieved. See Pan, 120 Nev. at 224, 88 P.3d at 841.
Accordingly, we deny the petition. See NRAP 21(b)(1); Smith v. Eighth
Judicial Dist. Court, 107 Nev. 674, 677, 818 P.2d 849, 851 (1991)
(providing that whether to consider a writ petition is within this court's
discretion).
It is so ORDERED.
Hardesty
t or
Douglas
1741
SUPREME COURT
OF
NEVADA
2
(0) 1947A
cc: Hon. Rob Bare, District Judge
Mitchell Pletcher
Eric Smithers
The Williamson Law Office, PLLC
Ray Sankovich
Caruso Law Offices
McDonald Carano Wilson LLP/Reno
Gordon Silver/Reno
Eighth District Court Clerk
SUPREME COURT
OF
NEVADA
3
(0) 1947A