Dickinson v. Ocwen Loan Serv. ( 2014 )

 (2011). The August 19 order further provided that petitioner's case was
closed and remained that way, given that the case had been removed to
federal court over five years earlier, and thus, the district court lacked
subject matter jurisdiction. See id.
Having considered the petition, we conclude that petitioner
has failed to demonstrate that extraordinary relief is warranted, and we
therefore deny the petition. See Pan v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court, 120
Nev. 222, 228, 88 P.3d 840, 844 (2004); NRAP 21(b)(1); see also 28 U.S.C. §
1446(d) (providing that once an action is removed to federal court, the
state court loses jurisdiction over the matter unless and until the federal
court remands the action). Accordingly, we
ORDER the petition DENIED.
Ackua
Parriatarrr
J.
Saitta
cc: Hon. Abbi Silver, District Judge
Terence K. Dickinson
Roger P. Croteau & Associates, Ltd.
Eighth District Court Clerk
SUPREME COURT
OF
NEVADA
2
(0) 1947A Q464 .
}