Hughes v. Dist. Ct. (Johnson) ( 2014 )

 In this case, petitioner seeks disqualification of the district
court judge assigned to his case. But the appendix that petitioner filed in
this court does not provide any indication that petitioner filed an
appropriate motion in this district court, as required by NRS 1.235, to
disqualify the district court judge. Therefore, we conclude that petitioner
has not demonstrated that our intervention by way of extraordinary relief
is warranted. NRAP 21(a)(4) (providing that the petitioner shall provide
in the appendix all documents "that may be essential to understand the
matters set forth in the petition"); Pan, 120 Nev. at 228, 88 P.3d at 844;
see also NRAP 21(b)(1). Accordingly, we
ORDER the petition DENIED.
Pickering
Poem t
IteL,:ntreesmaigamm, J.
Parnairre
ditta.
cc: Hon. Patrick Flanagan, District Judge
Danny L. Hughes
Goedert & Associates
Washoe District Court Clerk
SUPREME COURT
OF
NEVADA
2
(0) 1947A