Matthews, Jr. v. Dist. Ct. (State) ( 2013 )

 Having considered the petition and the attached documents,
we conclude that our intervention by extraordinary writ relief is not
warranted. See NRS 34.160; Pan, 120 Nev. at 228, 88 P.3d at 844. While
we are concerned by petitioner's contention that this motion has been
pending for over 14 months, we trust that the district court will resolve
the matters pending before it as promptly as its calendar permits.
Accordingly, we
ORDER the petition DENIED. 1
J.
, J.
Saitta
1 We direct the clerk of this court to file petitioner's February 27,
2013, motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis, and we conclude that
no action is necessary on this motion or on petitioner's July 17, 2013,
motion to proceed in forma pauperis as an order waiving the filing fee has
been entered. We also direct the clerk of this court to file the March 12,
2013, proper person notice of change of address, and the May 8, 2013,
proper person request for submission of pleadings, and we conclude that
no action is necessary on these documents. Further, we direct the clerk of
this court to file the proper person motion for leave to file a petition for a
writ of mandamus, provisionally received on July 26, 2013, and in light of
this order, we deny the motion as moot.
SUPREME COURT
OF
NEVADA
2
(0) 1947A
cc: Felton L. Matthews, Jr.
Attorney General/Carson City
Eighth District Court Clerk
SUPREME COURT
OF
NEVADA
(0) 1947A