Lepolo (Tuly) Vs. Dist. Ct. (State) ( 2021 )

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TH-E STATE OF NEVADA
TULY LEPOLO, No, 83291
Petitioner,
vs.
THE EIGHTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT
COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA,
IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF FILED
CLARK; THE HONORABLE MICHAEL
VILLANL DISTRICT J LLDG E; AN D TH E AUG 1 2 2021
HONORABLE DAVID BARKER, ELIZABETH A. BROWN
CLERK • PREME COURT
SENIOR JUDGE, BY
DEPUTY CLERK.
Respondents,
and
THE STATE OF NEVADA,
Real Party in Interest.
ORDER DENYING PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS
This original petition for a writ of mandamus challenges district
court oral decisions denying a motion for bail and a renewed motion for bail.
It is petitioner's burden to demonstrate that extraordinary
relief is warranted. Pan v. Eighth judicial Dist. Court, 120 Nev. 222, 998,
88 P.3d 840, 844 (2004). As part of petitioner's burden, it was his obligation
to provide an appendix that includes all records essential to understand the
issues raised in the petition. See NRAP 21(a)(4); Pan, 120 Nev. at 228-29,
88 P.3d at 844. This obligation included, at a minimum. contacting real
party in interest and the district court to facilitate preparation of the court's
order and, if such an order was not promptly forthcoming, proposing his
own order for the district court's review. See Rust v. Clark Cty. Sch. Dist.,
103 Nev. 686, 689, 747 P.2d 1380, 1382 (1987) (explaining that a written
order is essential to this court's review). Petitioner does not, however. argue
Soften Couar
OF
NEVADA
10) 1947A 460
or demonstrate that he made any such attempt to do so, instead merely
indicating that no written order was entered. Accordingly, we
ORDER the petition DENIED.
6-dt c„) .
Hardesty
J.
Parraguirre Cadish
cc: Chiefjudge, The Eighth judicial District Court
Hon. David Barker, Senior Judge
Hon. Michael Villani, District Judge
Special Public Defender
Attorney General/Carson City
Clark County District Attorney
Eighth District Court Clerk
SUPREME COURT
OF
NEVADA
2
101 1947A 04601e,