In Re: El Capitan Precious Metals, Inc. ( 2021 )


Menu:
  •                       IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
    IN THE MATTER OF EL CAPITAN                            No. 82875
    PRECIOUS METALS, INC.
    DANIEL GAINNO MARTINEZ.
    Appellant,                                                 HLED
    vS.
    DOUGLAS SANDERS,                                           AUG 1 2 2021
    Respondent.                                              EUZABETH A. BROWN
    CLERK 0 SU EME COURT
    BY
    ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL
    This is a pro se appeal from a district court order granting a
    motion to strike various filings, including a motion for relief under NRCP
    60.
    Our review of the record and other documents before this court
    reveals a jurisdictional defect. Only [a] party who is aggrieved by an
    appealable judgment or ordee has the right to appeal. NRAP 3A(a). A
    person is not considered a party within the meaning of NRAP 3A(a) unless
    he "has been named as a party of record in the trial court." Valley Bank of
    Nevada v. Ginsburg, 1.
    10 Nev. 440
     448. 
    874 P.2d 729
    , 735 (1994). "[lit has
    been the consistent policy of this court to foster simplicity, clarity and
    certainty in our jurisdictional rules by refraining from ad hoc dispensations
    and exceptions that would allow persons or entities who were not parties
    of record to appeal. Gladys I3aker Olsen Family Tr. v. Olsen, 109 Nev, 838,
    841, 
    858 P.2d 385
    , 387 (1993).
    Further, consistent with our limited appellate jurisdiction, this
    court construes the term "party" narrowly. For example, in Valley Bank of
    Nevada v. Ginsburg, this court dismissed an appeal brought by nonparty
    SUMP.% COURT
    OF
    NEVADA
    (0) 1447A
    -‘231170
    •:..
    shareholders seeking to challenge a settlernent agreement, even though
    they had appeared in the district court and objected to the proposed
    settlement. 110 Nev. at 448. 874 P.2d at        We concluded that they were
    not parties with standing to appeal because "l. t. lhey never intervened and
    thus never became parties of record in the trial court." Id.
    Here, appellant was not a named party of record in the
    proceedings below. Nor did he seek to intervene. Therefore, appellant is
    not a party with standing to appeal. Accordingly, because this court lacks
    jurisdicti on, we
    ORDER this appeal DISMISSED.'
    ,
    Hardesty
    Parraguirre
    cc:   Hon. Carli Lynn Kierny, District Judge
    Daniel Gabino Martinez
    Leah Martin Law
    Eighth District Court Clerk
    'In light of this order, we take no action regarding the letter filed by
    appellant on July 14, 2021.
    SUPREME COURT
    OF
    NEVADA
    9
    (0)   1947A AD.
    6:4   4.4
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 82875

Filed Date: 8/12/2021

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 12/6/2021