Intrustion Prot. Sys., Inc. Vs. Dist. Ct. (Curtis) ( 2021 )


Menu:
  •                              IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
    INTRUSTION PROTECTION                                    No. 83760
    SYSTEMS, INC., A NEVADA
    CORPORATION,
    Petitioner,
    vs.                                                        FILED
    THE EIGHTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT
    COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA,                              DEC 0 3 2021
    IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF                                            A BROWN
    PREME COuk-F
    CLARK; AND THE HONORABLE
    GLORIA STURMAN, DISTRICT                                              EN<
    JUDGE,
    Respondents,
    and
    JUSTIN CURTIS, AN INDIVIDUAL;
    FRANKLIN JOHNSON, II, AN
    INDIVIDUAL; AND RYAN ADAME, AN
    INDIVIDUAL,
    Real Parties in Interest.
    ORDER DENYING PETITION FOR A WRIT OF MANDAMUS
    OR PROHIBITION
    This original petition seeks a writ of mandamus, or in the
    alternative, a writ of prohibition, directing the district court to reverse its
    denial of petitioner's request for a temporary protective order regarding
    petitioner's sales techniques, strategies, and training methods, which
    petitioner contends are confidential.
    Problematically, petitioner has not provided this court with
    exhibits or other documentation that would support its claims for relief. See
    NRAP 21(a)(4) (providing the petitioner shall submit an appendix
    containing all documents "essential to understand the matters set forth in
    the petition"). Although petitioner references an order by the district court,
    SUPREME COURT
    OF
    it failed to provide it. This court will not consider a petition for
    NEVADA
    10) I 947A   cAID).
    z-     _ 3(4E7_2,
    ••••1
    extraordinary relief in the absence of the written order being challenged.
    See Rust v. Clark Cty. Sch. Dist., 
    103 Nev. 686
    , 689, 
    747 P.2d 1380
    , 1382
    (1987).
    Therefore, without deciding the merits of the claims raised, we
    decline to exercise our original jurisdiction in this matter, see NRAP 21(b);
    Pan v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court, 
    120 Nev. 222
    , 228, 
    88 P.3d 840
    , 844
    (2004) ("PetitionerH cardies] the burden of demonstrating that
    extraordinary relief is warranted."). Accordingly, we
    ORDER the petition DENIED.
    /                         , C.J.
    Hal:desty
    , j.
    arraguirre                                Stiglich
    cc:   Hon. Gloria Sturman, District Judge
    Brandon L. Phillips, Attorney At Law, PLLC
    Garman Turner Gordon
    Eighth District Court Clerk
    SUPREME COURT
    Of
    NEVADA
    (0) I947A VOYD
    35W
    • 6``.."- •
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 83760

Filed Date: 12/3/2021

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 12/6/2021