King v. Warden ( 2013 )

petition would have been dismissed regardless of his response as it was
time-barred pursuant to NRS 34.726, which requires such a habeas corpus
petition to be filed within one year of the entry of the judgment of
conviction. See Lewis, 518 U.S. at 356 (providing that in order to establish
a claim for lack of access to the courts, one must demonstrate that he or
she was prevented from pursuing a nonfrivolous claim); see also Alvarez v.
Hill, 518 F.3d 1152, 1155 n.1 (9th Cir. 2008). Accordingly, we
ORDER the judgment of the district court AFFIRMED.'
J.
pd
esty
#4164.0k
Parraguirre
J.
cc: Hon. Jerry A. Wiese, District Judge
Matthew James King
Attorney General/Carson City
Eighth District Court Clerk
"Having considered appellant's other arguments, we conclude that
they lack merit.
2