Morneault, Rph Vs. Dist. Ct. (Adams) ( 2021 )


Menu:
  •                             IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
    EMIL MORNEAULT, RPH,                                   No. 83699
    Petitioner,
    vs.
    THE EIGHTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT
    COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA,
    IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF CLARK;
    AND THE HONORABLE MONICA
    TRUJILLO, DISTRICT JUDGE,                                 FILED
    Respondents,
    and                                                       DEC 1 7 2021
    PATRICIA ANN ADAMS,                                     ELIZABETH A. BROWN
    CLERK OVUPREME COURT
    INDIVIDUALLY, IN HER CAPACITY AS                     BY
    TRUSTEE OF THE STEWART FAMILY                              DEPUTY CLERK.
    TRUST, DATED JANUARY 31, 2007, IN
    HER CAPACITY AS SPECIAL
    ADMINISTRATOR OF THE ESTATE OF
    CONNIE STEWART AND IN HER
    CAPACITY AS SPECIAL
    ADMINISTRATOR OF THE ESTATE OF
    GARY STEWART; GARY LINCK
    STEWART, JR., AN INDIVIDUAL;
    MARY KAY FALLON, AN INDIVIDUAL;
    ELIZABETH A. HODGE, AN
    INDIVIDUAL; AND MINH NGUYEN,
    M.D.,
    Real Parties in Interest.
    ORDER DENYING PETITION FOR A WRIT OF MANDAMUS
    This original petition for a writ of mandamus challenges a
    district court order denying a motion to dismiss in part. Having considered
    the petition and its supporting documentation, we are not persuaded that
    our extraordinary and discretionary intervention is warranted. See Pan v.
    Eighth Judicial Dist. Court, 
    120 Nev. 222
    , 228, 
    88 P.3d 840
    , 844 (2004)
    (observing that the party seeking writ relief bears the burden of showing
    SUPREME COURT
    OF
    NEVADA
    101 1947A ailEDIE.
    such relief is warranted); Smith v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court, 
    107 Nev. 674
    , 677, 679, 
    818 P.2d 849
    , 851, 853 (1991) (recognizing that writ relief is
    an extraordinary remedy and that this court has sole discretion in
    determining whether to entertain a writ petition). Specifically, we
    generally decline to exercise our discretion to grant writ petitions
    challenging orders denying motions to dismiss, and we are not convinced
    any of the exceptions apply in this case. See Smith v. Eighth Judicial Dist.
    Court, 
    113 Nev. 1343
    , 1344-45, 
    950 P.2d 280
    , 281 (1997) (discussing the
    exceptions to the general rule). We therefore
    ORDER the petition DENIED.'
    Hardesty
    Sr.J.
    Herndon
    cc:   Hon. Monica Trujillo, District Judge
    Weinberg, Wheeler, Hudgins, Gunn & Dial, LLC/Las Vegas
    Hayes Wakayama
    Lewis Brisbois Bisgaard & Smith, LLP/Las Vegas
    Eighth District Court Clerk
    'The Honorable Mark Gibbons, Senior Justice, participated in the
    decision of this matter under a general order of assignment.
    SUPREME COURT
    Of
    NEVADA
    2
    (Op 1947A    .4E0A>
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 83699

Filed Date: 12/17/2021

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 12/20/2021