Coffin (Saulualofaiga) v. Dist. Ct. (State) ( 2013 )


Menu:
  •                             A writ of habeas corpus is only available to prisoners seeking
    to invalidate their confinement or its duration, "either directly through an
    injunction compelling speedier release or indirectly through a judicial
    determination that necessarily implies the unlawfulness of the State's
    custody." Wilkinson v. Dotson, 
    544 U.S. 74
    , 81 (2005). Claims not directly
    affecting a prisoner's confinement or the duration of that confinement
    must be brought under some other theory.       See NRS 34.360; Wilkinson,
    
    544 U.S. at 82
     (prisoners' claims did not implicate habeas corpus because
    they were not seeking an immediate or speedier release from
    confinement).
    As petitioner has not tendered a guilty plea or been found
    guilty of the alleged offenses and there is no indication that he is being
    unlawfully confined or restrained, we are not satisfied that our
    intervention is warranted. We conclude that the petitioner has an
    adequate remedy by way of an appeal should he be convicted. Accordingly,
    we
    ORDER the petition DENIED.
    Gibbons
    J.
    Douglas                                    Saitta
    cc:   Hon. Jennifer P. Togliatti, District Judge
    The Pariente Law Firm, P.C.
    Attorney General/Carson City
    Clark County District Attorney
    Eighth District Court Clerk
    SUPREME COURT
    OF
    NEVADA
    2
    (0) I947A
    M2=111111E11111111111E110=15111111
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 63493

Filed Date: 9/18/2013

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 10/30/2014