Martinez (Henry) v. State ( 2013 )

 of some of the actuarial assessments, the record supports the district
court's implicit conclusion that the evaluator's opinion was based on
"currently accepted standards of assessment." NRS 176A.110(1)(a); see
Blackburn, 129 Nev. at , 294 P.3d at 426-27. Accordingly, we conclude
that the district court did not abuse its discretion, see id. at , 294 P.3d
at 427, and we
ORDER the judgment of conviction AFFIRMED.
z_t.-ci9-1 J.
Douglas Saitta
cc: Hon. David A. Hardy, District Judge
Washoe County Public Defender
Attorney General/Carson City
Washoe County District Attorney
Washoe District Court Clerk
SUPREME COURT
OF
NEVADA
2
(0) 1947A tf0
7,