Hamm (Barron) v. State ( 2013 )

 Appellant did not demonstrate cause for the delay because he failed to
demonstrate that he reasonably believed an appeal was pending and that
he filed his petition within a reasonable time of learning no appeal had
been taken. 3 Hathaway v. State, 119 Nev. 248, 255, 71 P.3d 503, 508
(2003). Accordingly, we
ORDER the judgment of the district court AFFIRMED. 4
Gibbons
J.
Douglas
J.
Saitta
cc: Hon. Jennifer P. Togliatti, District Judge
Barron Hamm
Attorney General/Carson City
Clark County District Attorney
Eighth District Court Clerk
3 We note that appellant first litigated a motion to withdraw the
guilty plea during the two-year period of his delay.
4We have reviewed all documents that appellant has submitted in
proper person to the clerk of this court in this matter, and we conclude
that no relief based upon those submissions is warranted. To the extent
that appellant has attempted to present claims or facts in those
submissions which were not previously presented in the proceedings
below, we have declined to consider them in the first instance.
SUPREME COURT
OF
NEVADA
2
(0) 1947A