Gillen v. Dist. Ct. (Grierson) ( 2013 )


Menu:
  •                             Having considered the parties' arguments and the supporting
    documents presented to this court, we conclude that our intervention by
    way of extraordinary writ relief is not warranted, see Smith, 107 Nev. at
    677, 818 P.2d at 851, and petitioner's underlying action shall therefore
    proceed forward in the Fifth Judicial District Court, where it is currently
    docketed. To the extent that the order transferring petitioner's case to the
    Eighth Judicial District Court has not been vacated, however, petitioner
    should take appropriate action in the Fifth Judicial District Court to
    ensure that the transfer order is set aside. Accordingly, we
    ORDER the petition DENIED.'
    Gibbons
    J.
    Saitta
    "The clerk of this court shall file petitioner's July 9, 2013, motion,
    his August 6, 2013, correction of address, and his August 20, 2013, reply.
    In light of this order, we deny all further requests for relief pending in this
    matter.
    SUPREME COURT
    OF
    NEVADA
    2
    (0) 1947A
    cc: Raymond Gillen
    Attorney General/Carson City
    Clark County District Attorney/Civil Division
    Eighth District Court Clerk
    Nye County Clerk
    SUPREME COURT
    OF
    NEVADA
    3
    (0) 1947A
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 62249

Filed Date: 9/20/2013

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 10/30/2014