Gong v. Dist. Ct. (Federal National Mort. Assoc.) ( 2013 )


Menu:
  •                 (2004); NRAP 21(c) (providing that a petition for an extraordinary writ
    other than prohibition or mandamus generally shall be sought in the same
    manner as a petition for a writ of prohibition or mandamus).
    Having reviewed the petition and its supporting
    documentation, we conclude that our intervention by way of extraordinary
    writ relief is not warranted as petitioners have an adequate legal remedy
    available in the form of an appeal from the district court order denying
    their petition for a writ of prohibition or mandamus.    See NRS 34.020(2);
    Ashokan v. State, Dep't. of Ins., 
    109 Nev. 662
    , 665-66, 
    856 P.2d 244
    , 246
    (1993) (explaining that this court has jurisdiction to consider an appeal
    from a district court order denying a petition for a writ of prohibition or
    mandamus). Accordingly, we
    ORDER the petition DENIED.'
    /                       J.
    Hardesty
    Parraguirre
    J.
    "In light of this order, we deny petitioner's August 14, 2013,
    emergency motion for a stay as moot.
    SUPREME COURT
    OF
    NEVADA
    (0) 1947A
    cc: Hon. James Todd Russell, District Judge
    Tory M. F'ankopf
    Pite Duncan, LLP
    Carson City Clerk
    SUPREME COURT
    OF
    NEVADA
    (0) 1947A
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 63734

Filed Date: 8/15/2013

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 4/18/2021