Mendoza-Guerrero (Jose) v. State ( 2013 )

 Appellant pleaded guilty while represented by counsel and
assisted by a court interpreter. During the court's canvass, appellant
confirmed that the interpreter had done a site translation of the guilty
plea agreement for him and that he thoroughly understood all of the
contents of the written agreement, which included separate sections
addressing the stipulated sentences and the possible immigration
consequences of his plea. We discern no abuse of discretion by the district
court in denying appellant's presentence motion to withdraw his guilty
plea. See Rubio v. State, 124 Nev. 1032, 1040, 194 P.3d 1224, 1229-30
(2008); Crawford v. State, 117 at 721-22, 30 P.3d at 1125-26. Accordingly,
we
ORDER the judgment of conviction AFFIRMED.
i v
CAI lo , J.
Douglas
J.
Saitta
cc: Hon. Valorie J. Vega, District Judge
Clark County Public Defender
Attorney General/Carson City
Clark County District Attorney
Eighth District Court Clerk
2