Buckner (Donald) v. State ( 2013 )

 Nev. 107, 110, 110 P.3d 486, 487 (2005) (internal quotation marks
omitted). Here, pursuant to negotiations and as reflected in the plea
agreement memoranda, the State sought "small" habitual criminal
adjudication pursuant to NRS 207.010(1)(a). The plea agreement noted
that "Wile State will be free to argue for an appropriate sentence." The
State followed the terms of the agreement at the sentencing hearing by
asking for habitual criminal adjudication pursuant to NRS 207.010(1)(a)
and the imposition of a prison term within the statutory range. Nothing
in the record indicates that the State was precluded from arguing in the
manner Buckner suggests. Buckner concedes that he did not object to the
alleged breach of the plea agreement, and we conclude that he fails to
demonstrate plain error entitling him to relief. See Sullivan v. State, 115
Nev. 383, 387 n.3, 990 P.2d 1258, 1260 n.3 (1999) (we review an
unobjected-to plea breach allegation for plain error). Accordingly, we
ORDER the judgment of conviction AFFIRMED.
J.
cc: Hon. Brent T. Adams, District Judge
Michael V. Roth
Attorney General/Carson City
Washoe County District Attorney
Washoe District Court Clerk
SUPREME COURT
OF
NEVADA
(0) 1947A
2