Misiewicz v. Warden ( 2014 )

 was computing his sentence, appellant failed to support this claim with
specific facts that, if true, would have entitled him to relief. Hargrove v.
State, 100 Nev. 498, 502, 686 P.2d 222, 225 (1984).
Appellant also claimed that NDOC improperly refused to place
him in a minimum security facility. Placement is a condition of
confinement and thus may not be challenged in a post-conviction petition
for a writ of habeas corpus. Bowen v. Warden, 100 Nev. 489, 686 P.2d 250(1984). Further, we note that appellant is currently out on parole and this
issue is moot. Therefore, the district court did not err in dismissing the
petition, and we
ORDER the judgment of the district court AFFIRMED.
Hardest
ei
J.
Douglas
isr As
7
cc: Hon. Adriana Escobar, District Judge
William Carl Misiewicz
Attorney General/Las Vegas
Eighth District Court Clerk
SUPREME COURT
OF
NEVADA
2
(0) 1947A