Haugabook v. Dist. Ct. (Haugabook) ( 2013 )

 Petitioner has the burden of demonstrating that our extraordinary
intervention is warranted, and an appeal is typically considered an
adequate legal remedy that precludes writ relief. NRS 34.170; NRS
34.330; Pan v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court, 120 Nev. 222, 228, 88 P.3d 840,
844 (2004).
Having considered the petition, we conclude that our
intervention by way of extraordinary relief is not warranted. See NRAP
21(b); Pan, 120 Nev. at 228, 88 P.3d at 844; Smith, 107 Nev. at 677, 818
P.2d at 851 (stating that the issuance of an extraordinary writ is purely
discretionary with this court). Accordingly, we
ORDER the petition DENIED.
Gibbons
J.
J.
Saitta
cc: Hon. Jennifer Elliott, District Judge, Family Court Division
Anthony Haugabook
Lisa Anne Haugabook
Attorney General/Carson City
Eighth District Court Clerk
SUPREME COURT
OF
NEVADA
2
(0) 1947A