Falconi v. Corazon Real Estate ( 2013 )


Menu:
  •                         Sunde v. Contel of California, 
    112 Nev. 541
    , 542-43, 
    915 P.2d 298
    , 299
    (1996) (explaining that nonlawyers may not represent entities in court);
    Salman v. Newell, 
    110 Nev. 1333
    , 1336, 
    885 P.2d 607
    , 608 (1994)
    (observing that no statute or rule permits a nonlawyer to represent an
    entity and concluding that an entity cannot proceed in proper person). As
    we do not allow laypersons to represent parties or entities and business
    entities are not permitted to appear or file documents in proper person,
    respondent's answer and all other motions and documents filed in the
    district court by respondent were improper and should have been stricken
    by the district court. Stu's Bail Bonds, 115 Nev.at 436 n.1, 991 P.2d at 470
    n.1; Sunde, 
    112 Nev. at 542-43
    , 
    915 P.2d at 299
    ; Salman, 110 Nev. at
    1336, 
    885 P.2d at 608
    . Respondent's motion to dismiss was, therefore, also
    improperly considered by the district court and the district court erred in
    considering and granting the motion. Accordingly, we
    ORDER the judgment of the district court REVERSED AND
    REMAND this matter to the district court for proceedings consistent with
    this order.'
    /
    de sty
    Parraguirre
    C 11,24
    Cherry
    "In light of this order, we deny as moot appellant's December 19,
    2012, proper person motion.
    SUPREME COURT
    OF
    NEVADA
    2
    (0) 1947A    m3(t_111
    cc:   Hon. Scott N. Freeman, District Judge
    Alexander Falconi
    Corazon Real Estate
    Washoe District Court Clerk
    SUPREME COURT
    OF
    NEVADA
    3
    (0) 1947A
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 62296

Filed Date: 4/12/2013

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 10/30/2014