Tooski v. Trujillo ( 2013 )

 making an adequate appellate record" and "[w]hen an appellant fails to
include necessary documentation in the record, we necessarily presume
that the missing portion supports the district court's decision"). Further,
without any document in the record showing what, if any, pretrial
disclosures were made by appellant, we cannot determine whether
appellant's initial NRCP 16.1(a)(1) disclosure sufficiently disclosed all of
the witnesses and exhibits appellant intended to use. Therefore, we must
presume that the record would support the district court's finding that
appellant's NRCP 16.1(a)(1) disclosures were insufficient. Cuzze, 123 Nev.
at 603, 172 P.3d at 135. As a result, we affirm the district court's order
excluding appellant's exhibits and witnesses and ultimately dismissing
appellant's complaint. Id.; NRCP 16.1(g); NRCP 16.1(e)(3).
It is so ORDERED.
,J
Gibbons
ue-PiI ,
Dou
Saitta
cc: Hon. Kenneth C. Cory, District Judge
Ehsan Tooski
Prestige Law Group
Eighth District Court Clerk
SUPREME COURT
OF
NEVADA
2
(0) 1947A