Hallenback v. Hallenback ( 2014 )


Menu:
  •                         sufficiently compelling circumstances for the unequal distribution of the
    community property at issue here, namely, that because Joseph earned
    the Carpenters pension after the parties separated it was fair to award
    that pension to Joseph. The unique circumstances present support the
    district court's decision: the parties were separated for over 20 years
    without divorcing, and Joseph did not get the job that produced the
    Carpenters pension benefits until 6 years after the parties separated.
    Furthermore, the district court's division of the parties' community
    property was not one-sided, as Rhonda received the full pension benefits
    that Joseph earned from a different job while the pair actually
    cohabitated.
    Rhonda argues that this court has recognized only financial
    misconduct resulting in economic loss as compelling enough to justify an
    unequal distribution of community property under NRS 125.150(1)(b). See
    Putterman v. Putterman, 
    113 Nev. 606
    , 608-09, 
    939 P.2d 1047
    , 1048-49
    (1997); Lofgren v. Lofgren, 
    112 Nev. 1282
    , 1283-85, 
    926 P.2d 296
    , 297-98
    (1996). But those cases do not interpret the statute as limited solely to
    those circumstances, nor does the statute delineate such a limited
    understanding on the compelling reasons that may support unequal
    division.
    Finally, Rhonda argues that NRS 125.155, which controls the
    valuation of public employee pensions for the purposes of divorce
    proceedings, demonstrates this State's pension division policy for divorces.
    But the specific rules governing public employee pensions did not take
    away the district court's discretionary authority under NRS 125.150(1)(b)
    to unequally divide the non-public pension at issue here.
    SUPREME COURT
    OF
    NEVADA
    2
    (0) I947A    Citi   s
    The district court's findings merit deference, and we discern
    no abuse of discretion in this division. Accordingly, we
    ORDER the judgment of the district court AFFIRMED.
    Piekm.tar
    '         J.
    Pickering
    cc: Hon. James E. Wilson, District Judge
    Robert A. Grayson
    Rusby Clark, PLLC
    Lemons, Grundy & Eisenberg
    Legal Aid Center of Southern Nevada
    Anne R. Traum
    Carson City Clerk
    SUPREME COURT
    OF
    NEVADA                                           3
    (0) 1947A
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 59203

Filed Date: 9/26/2014

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 4/18/2021