McGee v. State ( 2014 )

 his plea canvass, noted that McGee stated that he felt "clear-headed" and
was properly medicated at the time, and recalled that "we proceeded to
talk about your case and your constitutional rights." The district court
stated that it accepted McGee's guilty plea after he answered in the
affirmative to the question of whether he was pleading guilty because he
was, in fact, guilty of the charged offense. At that point, the district court
announced, "And so today is the date and time set for sentencing in this
matter, And I'm prepared to go forward with the sentencing."
We conclude that the district court's announcement amounts
to a denial of the oral motion. McGee offers no relevant authority to
support his claim that the district court was obligated to explore his
request "more fully." Our review of the record reveals that McGee failed
to either provide a substantial, fair, and just reason which required the
withdrawal of his plea, see Crawford, 117 Nev. at 721, 30 P.3d at 1125, or
satisfy his burden and prove that his plea was invalid, see Molina v. State,
120 Nev. 185, 190, 87 P.3d 533,537 (2004). We conclude that the district
court did not abuse its discretion by denying McGee's motion, see Johnson
v. State, 123 Nev. 139, 144, 159 P.3d 1096, 1098 (2007), and we
ORDER the judgment of conviction AFFIRMED.
J.
Pickering
\ jt.A. GL—C , J.
Parraguirre
J.
Saitta
SUPREME COURT
OF
NEVADA
2
(0) 1947A e
cc: Hon. Lidia Stiglich, District Judge
Washoe County Public Defender
Attorney General/Carson City
Washoe County District Attorney
Washoe District Court Clerk
SUPREME COURT
OF
NEVADA
3
(0) I947A