Washington v. Nev. Dept. of Corrections ( 2013 )

 available, however, when an adequate and speedy legal remedy exists.
Pan v. Dist. Ct., 120 Nev. 222, 224, 88 P.3d 840, 841 (2004).
A review of appellant's proper person appeal statement and
the appellate record reveals that the district court did not abuse its
discretion in denying appellant's writ petition. City of Reno, 119 Nev. at
58, 63 P.3d at 1148. Namely, the district court determined that appellant
had an adequate and speedy legal remedy in the form of a 42 U.S.C.
§ 1983 action. Pan, 120 Nev. at 224, 88 P.3d at 841. Moreover, the
district court determined that evidence supported the disciplinary action
taken against appellant and that, as such, respondent did not arbitrarily
or capriciously exercise its discretion. NRS 34.160; International Game
Tech., 124 Nev. at 197, 179 P.3d at 558. Accordingly, we
ORDER the judgment of the district court AFFIRMED.
Gibbons
cc: Hon. James Todd Russell, District Judge
Bernard Washington
Attorney General/Carson City
Carson City Clerk
SUPREME COURT
OF
NEVADA
(0) 1947A
2