Morris v. Dist. Ct. (Yampolsky) ( 2013 )


Menu:
  •                         course of law. NRS 34.170; NRS 34.330; Smith, 107 Nev. at 677, 818 P.2d
    at 851. Moreover, this court has held that the right to appeal is generally
    an adequate legal remedy precluding writ relief. Pan, 120 Nev. at 224, 88
    P.3d at 841.
    Having considered the petition, we conclude that our
    intervention by way of extraordinary relief is not warranted.   Smith, 107
    Nev. at 677, 818 P.2d at 851; NRAP 21(b)(1). Accordingly, we
    ORDER the petition DENIED.
    , J.
    Hardesty
    &AAA
    Parraguirre
    cc: Hon. Doug Smith, District Judge
    Cohen-Johnson LLC
    Thorndal Armstrong Delk Balkenbush & Eisinger/Las Vegas
    Eighth District Court Clerk
    SUPREME COURT
    OF
    NEVADA
    (0) 1947A
    ciffliffiragn                                         isf.1211101
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 63223

Filed Date: 6/14/2013

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 4/18/2021