Neuman v. Dist. Ct. (Bradley) ( 2014 )

 intervention is warranted. Pan v. Eighth Judicial Din. Court, 120 Nev.
222, 228, 88 P.3d 840, 844 (2004).
Having considered petitioners' arguments in light of the
underlying case's progression since the challenged orders were entered, we
are not persuaded that our intervention is warranted. Id. Consequently,
we decline to exercise our discretion to consider this writ petition, NRAP
21(b); Smith, 107 Nev. at 677, 818 P.2d at 851, and we
ORDER the petition DENIED.
J.
Pickering
cc: Hon. Susan Scann, District Judge
• Law Office of Arthur W. Tuverson
Barney C. Ales, Ltd.
E. Brent Bryson
Eighth District Court Clerk
SUPREME COURT
OF
NEVADA
2
(th 1947A el.