Wiebe (Kristie) v. State ( 2013 )

testimony that two reliable biomarkers were used together to determine that Wiebe consumed ethanol within 48 hours of testing and the results indicated it was not incidental exposure. We conclude that Wiebe fails to demonstrate that the district court abused its discretion by determining that her conduct was not as good as required, revoking her probation, terminating her from the diversion program, and entering the judgment of conviction. See id.; NRS 484C.340(5)(b). Accordingly, we ORDER the judgment of conviction AFFIRMED. 2 Gibbons Saitta cc: Hon. Nancy L. Porter, District Judge Elko County Public Defender Attorney General/Carson City Elko County District Attorney Elko County Clerk 2Although we filed the fast track statement and response, they fail to comply with the Nevada Rules of Appellate Procedure because the fast- track statement's margins are not at least 1-inch on all four sides and the response is not double-spaced. See NRAP 3C(h)(1); NRAP 32(a)(4) We caution counsel for both parties that future failure to comply with the Nevada Rules of Appellate Procedure may result in the imposition of sanctions. See NRAP 3C(n). SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA 2 (0) 1947A . • • . ••• •.• . smsentate mom semwszonnimunimmrsffalxMPEn: AM: .