Lewis (Willie) v. State ( 2016 )


Menu:
  •                           IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
    WILLIE SEAL LEWIS,                                     No. 69033
    Appellant,
    vs.
    THE STATE OF NEVADA,                                     FILED
    Respondent.
    JUN 1 7 2015
    ORDER OF AFFIRMANCE
    This is a pro se appeal from an order of the district court
    denying a motion to modify or correct an illegal sentence.' Eighth Judicial
    District Court, Clark County; Richard Scotti, Judge.
    Appellant argues that the district court erred in denying his
    September 17, 2015, motion. Specifically, appellant argues that the
    deadly weapon sentence enhancement was illegal pursuant to NRS
    193.165(4) because use of a deadly weapon was a necessary element of the
    offense as charged—robbery with the use of a deadly weapon. Appellant's
    claim fell outside the narrow scope of claims permissible in a motion to
    modify sentence. See Edwards v. State, 
    112 Nev. 704
    , 708, 
    918 P.2d 321
    ,
    324 (1996). The use of a deadly weapon is not a necessary element of the
    offense of robbery, see NRS 200.380(1), and the State properly set forth the
    deadly weapon enhancement with the robbery count as the deadly weapon
    enhancement does not create a separate offense, see NRS 193.165(3).
    'Having considered the pro se brief filed by appellant, we conclude
    that a response is not necessary. NRAP 46A(c). This appeal therefore has
    been submitted for decision based on the pro se brief and the record. See
    NRAP 34(0(3).
    SUPREME COURT
    OF
    NEVADA
    (0) 1947A    ea,
    -igLll l3
    Thus, appellant fails to demonstrate that his sentence was facially illegal.
    See 
    Edwards, 112 Nev. at 708
    , 918 P.2d at 324. Therefore, we conclude
    that the district court did not err in denying the motion.' Accordingly, we
    ORDER the judgment of the district court AFFIRMED.
    J.
    J.
    J.
    Gibbons
    cc:   Hon. Richard Scotti, District Judge
    Willie Seal Lewis
    Attorney General/Carson City
    Clark County District Attorney
    Eighth District Court Clerk
    'We decline to consider appellant's argument that the deadly
    weapon enhancement violates double jeopardy because appellant did not
    present that argument in the district court.
    SUPREME COURT
    OF
    NEVADA
    2
    (0) 1947A
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 69033

Filed Date: 6/17/2016

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 4/18/2021