Bowles (Travis) v. The Second Jud. Dist. Ct. ( 2022 )


Menu:
  •                              IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
    TRAVIS WILFORD BOWLES,                                  No. 84929
    Petitioner,
    vs.
    THE SECOND JUDICIAL DISTRICT
    COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA,                               FILED
    IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF
    WASHOE; AND THE HONORABLE                                   JUL 29 2022
    CONNIE J. STEINHEIMER, DISTRICT                           ELIZABETH A. BROWN
    CLERKgF SiPREME COURT
    JUDGE,
    BY
    Res • ondents.                                               DEPUll<
    ORDER DENYING PETITION
    This is an original pro se petition for a writ of mandamus or in
    the alternative to show cause pursuant to NRS 34.160 et seq. seeking to
    compel the district court to conduct an evidentiary hearing and consider the
    merits of petitioner's habeas petition.
    This court has original jurisdiction to issue writs of mandamus
    and the issuance of such extraordinary relief is within this court's sole
    discretion. See Nev. Const. art. 6, § 4; D.R. Horton, Inc. v. Eighth Judicial
    Dist. Court, 
    123 Nev. 468
    , 474-75, 
    168 P.3d 731
    , 736-37 (2007). Petitioner
    bears the burden to show that extraordinary relief is warranted and such
    relief is proper only when there is no plain, speedy, and adequate remedy
    at law. See Pan v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court, 
    120 Nev. 222
    , 224, 228, 
    88 P.3d 840
    , 841, 844 (2004).
    Although petitioner provided a brief affidavit wherein he
    references the dismissal of a habeas petition, he has not provided this court
    with any record or documentation in support of his claims and necessary for
    this court's consideration of the petition. See NRAP 21(a)(4) (providing that
    petitioner shall submit an appendix containing all documents "essential to
    SUPREME COURT
    OF
    NEVADA
    (01 1947A    44#2P.
    understand[ing] the matters set forth in the petition"). We conclude that
    petitioner has failed to demonstrate our intervention by extraordinary writ
    is warranted. Therefore, we decline to exercise our original jurisdiction in
    this matter. See NRAP 21(b). Accordingly, we
    ORDER the petition DENIED.
    P   rit,,ALA
    Parraguirre
    C.J.
    J.
    Hardesty
    Al•ZSbas-.0             J.
    Stiglich
    cc:   Hon. Connie J. Steinheimer, District Judge
    Travis Wilford Bowles
    Attorney General/Carson City
    Washoe District Court Clerk
    SUPREME COURT
    OF
    NEVADA
    2
    (0) 1947A    .46t,o
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 84929

Filed Date: 7/29/2022

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 8/2/2022