Matadamas-Serrano v. Clark Cty. Pub. Defender'S Office ( 2022 )

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA RUBEN MATADAMAS-SERRANO, No. 84988 Petitioner, vs. FILE CLARK COUNTY PUBLIC AUG 0 4 2022 DEFENDER'S OFFICE, ELIZABETH A. BROWN Respondent. CLERKPREME COURT \ DEPUTY CLERK ORDER DENYING PETITION FOR A WRIT OF MANDAMUS This original pro se petition for a writ of mandamus challenges a district court order denying petitioner's motion to dismiss counsel. Petitioner has failed to include with his petition necessary documentation supporting his request for relief. NRAP 21(a)(4) (petitioner must provide all documents essential to understand the matters set forth in the petition); NRAP 21(c) (petitions for extraordinary writs shall to the extent practicable conform to NRAP 21(a)). Accordingly, we ORDER the petition DENI Parr uirre J. Hardesty AlLtbat..V J. Stiglich ce: Hon. Jerry A. Wiese, Chief Judge Ruben Matadamas-Serrano Clark County Public Defender SUPREME COURT Eighth District Court Clerk OF NEVADA 111-17A 3-2-1-1475-