Keshava-Prasad, M.D. v. Dist. Ct. (Watts) ( 2022 )


Menu:
  • IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
    HOLAVANAHALLI KESHAVA-PRASAD, No. 84910
    M.D.; AND H. KESHAVA PRASAD, M.D.,
    PLLC,
    Petitioners,
    THE EIGHTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT
    COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA, AUG 11 2022
    IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF CLARK;
    AND THE HONORABLE GLORIA CLERK OF SUPREME COURT
    STURMAN, DISTRICT JUDGE, By Veen
    Respondents,
    and
    LASHAWANDA WATTS; VALLEY
    HEALTH SYSTEM, LLC, D/B/A DESERT
    SPRINGS HOSPITAL; ABDUL TARIQ,
    D.O.; NEUROLOGY CLINICS OF
    NEVADA LLC; AMIR QURESHI, M.D.;
    ROE AMIR QURESHI, M.D.,
    EMPLOYER; ALI HAQ, M.D.; ROE ALI
    HAQ, M.D., EMPLOYER; CHARLES
    KIM DANISH, D.O.; AND PLATINUM
    HOSPITALISTS, LLP,
    Real Parties in Interest.
    ORDER DENYING PETITION
    This original petition for a writ of mandamus challenges a
    district court order denying a motion to dismiss in a medical malpractice
    action. Having considered the petition and its documentation, we are not
    persuaded that our extraordinary and discretionary intervention 1s
    warranted. See Walker v. Second Judicial Dist. Court, 
    136 Nev. 678
    , 683,
    
    476 P.3d 1194
    , 1198 (2020) (declining to grant writ relief when a later
    appeal was available); Pan v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court, 
    120 Nev. 222
    ,
    228, 
    88 P.3d 840
    , 844 (2004) (observing that the party seeking writ relief
    SupREME Court
    OF
    Nevapa
    (0) (947A 2B 22--P-S2-0]
    bears the burden of showing such relief is warranted); Smith v. Eighth
    Judicial Dist. Court, 
    107 Nev. 674
    , 677, 679, 
    818 P.2d 849
    , 851, 853 (1991)
    (recognizing that writ relief is an extraordinary remedy and that this court
    has sole discretion in determining whether to entertain a writ petition).
    Generally, we will not consider writ petitions that challenge orders denying
    motions to dismiss, and we are not persuaded that any exception to the
    general rule applies here. Intl? Game Tech., Inc. v. Second Judicial Dist.
    Court, 
    124 Nev. 193
    , 197-98, 
    179 P.3d 556
    , 558-59 (2008) (discussing writ
    petitions challenging denials of motions to dismiss). We therefore
    ORDER the petition DENIED.!
    bi ff
    Ss ot head
    ee 4
    eS Pe Cte EL
    I
    Patraguirre
    Silver
    ce: Hon. Gloria Sturman, District Judge
    Lewis Brisbois Bisgaard & Smith, LLP/Las Vegas
    Greenman Goldberg Raby & Martinez
    Brenske Andreevski & Krametbauer
    John H. Cotton & Associates, Ltd.
    Hall Prangle & Schoonveld, LLC/Las Vegas
    Collinson, Daehnke, Inlow & Greco
    McBride Hall
    Eighth District Court Clerk
    In light of this, we deny as moot Valley Health System, LLC dba
    Desert Springs Hospital Medical Center’s July 29, 2022, motion for joinder
    to the writ petition.
    The Honorable Mark Gibbons, Senior Justice, participated in the
    decision of this matter under a general order of assignment.
    Supreme Court
    OF
    NEVADA 2
    (0) 1947 Bie
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 84910

Filed Date: 8/11/2022

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 8/12/2022