Sullivan (Keith) v. Dist. Ct. (Warden) ( 2022 )

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
KEITH WILLIAM SULLIVAN, No. 85075
Petitioner,
vs.
THE SECOND JUDICIAL DISTRICT
COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA, MED
IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF
WASHOE, AUG 1 0 2022
Respondent, ELIZA2,E1 A, 1:4 ROWN
REME COURT
CLERK Oi;
and
.ERK
PERRY RUSSELL, WARDEN,
Real Party in Interest.
ORDER DENYING PETITION
This original pro se postconviction petition for a writ of habeas
corpus challenges several actions of the district court regarding the
postconviction petition for a writ of habeas corpus that petitioner filed below
on November 10, 2021.
Having considered the petition, we are not persuaded that writ
relief is warranted, because petitioner has a plain, speedy, and adequate
legal remedy available to him by way of an appeal from any district court
order denying his petition in the first instance. See NRAP 22 ("An
application for an original writ of habeas corpus should be rnade to the
appropriate district court. If an application is made to the district court and
denied, the proper remedy is by appeal from the district court's order
denying the writ"); see also Pan u. Eighth judicial Dist. Court, 120 Nev.
222, 224, 88 P.3d 840, 844 (2004) ("Petitioned] cardies] the burden of
demonstrating that extraordinary relief is warranted," and writ relief is
SUPREME COURT
OF
NEVADA
(I/1 I947A _2\5-00 g
proper only when there is no plain, speedy, and adequate remedy at law).1
Accordingly, we
ORDER the petition DENIED.
Parraguirre
6 3-A g,e_e_A ,J A4/Zt,(1A--0
Hardesty Stiglich
cc: Keith William Sullivan
Attorney General/Carson City
Washoe County District Attorney
Washoe District Court Clerk
'Given our disposition here, we deny all of petitioners pending
motions and additional requests for relief as moot.
SUPREME COURT
OF
NEVADA
2
(r) I A