Harper v. State, Dep'T Of Motor Vehicles ( 2022 )

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA PHYLLIS HARPER, No. 84789 Petitioner, vs. THE STATE OF NEVADA DEPARTMENT OF MOTOR VEHICLES, AUG 1 0 2022 Respondent. ORDER DENYING PETITION This original pro se petition for extraordinary relief seeks review of the Nevada Department of Motor Vehicles' denial of petitioner's request for an evidentiary hearing regarding reinstatement of her license. Having reviewed the petition, we conclude that our extraordinary intervention is not warranted. Petitioner has failed to include with her petition necessary documentation supporting her request for relief. NRAP 21(a)(4) (petitioner must provide all documents essential to understand the matters set forth in the petition); NRAP 21(c) (petitions for extraordinary writs shall to the extent practicable conform to NRAP 21(a)). Accordingly, we ORDER the petition DENIED. L.A veR,64\ J. Hardesty Stiglich SUPREME COURT OF N EVADA in) I,N A c41, cc: Phyllis Harper Attorney General/Carson City SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA 2 I947A