Bowles v. State, Dep'T Of Corr. ( 2022 )

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
TRAVIS WILFORD BOWLES, No. 84969
Petitioner,
vs.
THE STATE OF NEVADA FILED
DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS,
OFFENDER MANAGEMENT AUG 1 8 2022
DIVISION, ELIZAMH A. BROWN
CLERK OF SUPREME COURT
Respondent. BY__ • \ Z_
DV:PUTY6C
ORDER DENYING PETITION
This is a pro se original petition for a writ of mandamus.
Having considered the petition, we are not persuaded that our
extraordinary intervention is warranted. See NRS 34.170; Pan v. Eighth
Judicial Dist. Court, 120 Nev. 222, 224, 88 P.3d 840, 841 (2004) (noting that
petitioner bears the burden of demonstrating that extraordinary relief is
warranted). Petitioner has not provided this court with exhibits or other
documentation that would support his claims for relief. See NRAP 21(a)(4)
(providing the petitioner shall submit an appendix containing all documents
CCessential to understand the matters set forth in the petition"). Accordingly,
we
ORDER the petition DENIED.
Parraguirre
n
L.ewi J.
Hardesty Stiglich
SUPREME COURT
OF
NEVADA
10.) 1947A
-,2523SC9
cc: Travis Wilford Bowles
Attorney General/Carson City
SUPREME COURT
OF
NEVADA
2
I 4)47 A