Martinez (Reddy) v. State ( 2014 )

 appellant failed to demonstrate any detrimental error to cumulate. Our
review of the record reveals that the district court's factual findings are
supported by substantial evidence and are not clearly wrong, and
appellant has not demonstrated that the district court erred as a matter of
law. See Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668, 687 (1984) (establishing
two-part test for ineffective assistance of counsel); Kirksey v. State, 112
Nev. 980, 987, 923 P.2d 1102, 1107 (1996) (adopting the test in
Strickland); see also Means v. State, 120 Nev. 1001, 1012, 103 P.3d 25, 33
(2004) (petitioner must prove the facts underlying his claims of ineffective-
assistance by a preponderance of the evidence). Accordingly, we
ORDER the judgment of the district court AFFIRMED.'
Hardesty
Douglas
r_
.4 j.
t
cc: Hon. Carolyn Ellsworth, District Judge
Nguyen & Lay
Attorney General/Carson City
Clark County District Attorney
Eighth District Court Clerk
3-The fast track statement does not comply with the formatting
requirements of NRAP 3C(h)(1) and NRAP 32(a)(4) because it is not
paginated. We caution respondent's counsel that failure to comply with
the applicable rules when filing briefs in this court may result in the
imposition of sanctions. See NRAP 3C(n).
SUPREME COURT
OF
NEVADA
2
(0) 1947A 7s0944