-
Even assuming Corpuz did not consent to the blood draw, we have recently held that, while the warrantless, nonconsensual search provided for in NRS 484C.160(7) is unconstitutional, the good-faith exception to the exclusionary remedy applies when an officer reasonably and in good faith relied on the constitution validity of the statute. See Byars v. State,. Nev. , P.3d (Adv. Op. No. 85, October 16, 2014). Therefore,, the district court did not err by denying Corpuz's motion to suppress. Next, Corpuz claims that the district court abused its discretion by denying his motion for a new trial based on prosecutorial misconduct. We review the denial of a motion for a new trial for an abuse of discretion. See Steese u. State,
114 Nev. 479, 490,
960 P.2d 321, 328 (1998). When considering allegations of prosecutorial misconduct, we first determine whether the prosecutor's conduct was improper and then whether any improper conduct warrants reversal. See Valdez u. State,
124 Nev. 1172, 1188,
196 P.3d 465, 476 (2008). Here, the prosecutor argued that Corpuz may have wanted to prove his car was faster than another, and Corpuz timely objected. After a brief bench conference, during which Corpuz claimed that the argument was not supported by evidence and was speculation, the district court sustained the objection, and the prosecutor immediately moved on. Even assuming that the argument constituted prosecutorial misconduct, we conclude that it was harmless error. See Truesdell v. State, 129 Nev. ,
304 P.3d 396, 402 (2013). Therefore, SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA 2 (0) 1947A the district court did not abuse its discretion by denying Corpuz's motion for a new trial. Having considered Corpuz's claims and concluded that no relief is warranted, we ORDER the judgment of conviction AFFIRMED. Hardesty ° D1774 j. Douglas cc: Hon. Michelle Leavitt, District Judge Mueller Hinds & Associates Attorney General/Carson City Clark County District Attorney Eighth District Court Clerk SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA 3 (0) I947A
Document Info
Docket Number: 64936
Filed Date: 11/12/2014
Precedential Status: Non-Precedential
Modified Date: 4/17/2021