In Re: Discipline Of Melissa F. Mack ( 2022 )


Menu:
  •                        IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
    IN THE MATTER OF DISCIPLINE OF                          No 85326
    MELISSA F. MACK, BAR NO. 8556.
    FILE
    NOV 2 2 202
    ELI   ETH A. B
    Ct.         SU
    BY
    H1EF DEPUTY CLERK
    ORDER IMPOSING RECIPROCAL DISCIPLINE
    AND DISBARRING ATTORNEY
    This is a petition to reciprocally discipline attorney Melissa F.
    Mack pursuant to SCR 114. Mack has been disbarred from the practice of
    law in California. Mack did not self-report her California discipline as
    required by SCR 114(1), nor did she respond to this petition, SCR 114(3).
    In representing personal injury clients, Mack willfully (1) failed
    to file and serve documents, appear at case conferences and hearings, and
    negotiate medical liens; (2) misled a superior court judge by making false
    statements about the status of a case, including falsely claiming that the
    defendant had accepted liability and the case had settled; (3) impersonated
    another attorney in emails and letters and misrepresented that the attorney
    was acting as co-counsel on a case; (4) made false statements to the court
    clerk about another attorney handling a case and being unable to appear;
    (5) sent letters and emails purportedly signed by another attorney to an
    insurance company without the other attorney's knowledge and the letters
    and emails contained raisrepresentations about the deadline for serving a
    summons and complaint; (6) failed to maintain client funds in a trust
    account and misappropriated funds owed to her clients and their medical
    providers; and (7) misrepresented to her clients that she had negotiated
    SUPREME COURT
    OF
    NEVADA
    (0) 1947A   -                                                                 IS • 1 vi         (21.
    medical liens.    These actions violated (1) former California Rule of
    Professional Conduct 3-110(A), similar to RPC 1.1 (competence); (2)
    California Business and Professions Code (CBPC) § 6068(d), similar to RPC
    3.31 (candor toward the tribunal—making a false statement of fact or law
    to a judge); (3) CBPC § 6103, similar to RPC 3.4(c) (fairness to opposing
    party and counsel—knowingly disobeying an obligation under the rules of a
    tribunal); (4) CBPC § 6106, similar to RPC 8.4(c) (misconduct involving
    dishonesty, fraud, deceit or misrepresentation); and (5) former California
    Rule of Professional Conduct 4-100(A), similar to RPC 1.15 (safekeeping
    property). As a result of these violations and her failure to participate in
    the disciplinary proceedings, the California Supreme Court entered an
    order disbarring Mack.'
    SCR 114(4) mandates the imposition of identical reciprocal
    discipline unless the attorney demonstrates, or this court finds, that one of
    four exceptions applies. None of the four exceptions apply in this case, and
    "[iln all other respects a final adjudication in another jurisdiction that an
    attorney   has   engaged   in   misconduct   conclusively   establishes the
    misconduct for the purpose of a disciplinary proceeding in this state." SCR
    'The California State Bar filed disciplinary charges against Mack and
    served notice of such on her. Mack filed a response, and the disciplinary
    hearing was continued based on Mack's alleged health issues. After Mack
    failed to appear at a subsequent status check, the disciplinary court ordered
    her to provide medical documentation to support her claim that she was
    unable to participate in court proceedings. Mack failed to do so, and she
    failed to appear at the final status conference despite confirming that she
    would participate telephonically. The court scheduled the disciplinary
    hearing and Mack was served with notice of the hearing in accordance with
    California rules. She did not appear, resulting in a default and the factual
    allegations in the complaint being deemed admitted. Mack did not move to
    set the default aside and the State Bar filed and served a petition for
    disbarment. Mack did not respond to the petition.
    SUPREME COURT
    OF
    NEVADA
    2
    (0) 1947A    41/ffis
    114(5). Accordingly, we grant the petition for reciprocal discipline and
    hereby disbar Melissa F. Mack from the practice of law in Nevada. The
    parties shall comply with SCR 115 and SCR 121.1.
    It is so ORDERED.2
    , C.J.
    Parraguirre                             Hardesty
    J.                                   ,   J.
    Stiglich                                Cadish
    J.
    P ckering                               Herndon
    cc:   Bar Counsel, State Bar of Nevada
    Melissa F. Mack
    Executive Director, State Bar of Nevada
    Admissions Office, U.S. Supreme Court
    2The  Honorable Abbi Silver having retired, this matter was decided
    by a six-justice court.
    SUPREME COURT
    OF
    NEVADA
    3
    (0) 1947A    • 41,2-1' -
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 85326

Filed Date: 11/22/2022

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 12/1/2022