-
our extraordinary intervention is warranted as they have an adequate legal remedy in the form of an appeal from the final judgment in the garnishee proceeding.' NRS 34.160; NRS 34.330; NRS 31.460; Pan v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court,
120 Nev. 222, 224-25, 228,
88 P.3d 840, 841, 844 (2004) (holding that an appeal is generally an adequate legal remedy precluding writ relief and that writ relief is not available to correct an untimely appeal); Frank Settelmeyer & Sons, Inc. v. Smith & Harmer, Ltd.,
124 Nev. 1206, 1214,
197 P.3d 1051, 1057 (2008) (explaining that "a judgment in favor of or against the garnishee defendant constitutes the final judgment in the garnishee proceeding, which may be appealed by an aggrieved party under. NRAP 3A(a) and (b)(1)"); NRAP 21(b)(1). Accordingly, we ORDER the petition DENIED. J. J. Gibbons cc: Hon. Connie J. Steinheimer, District Judge Clifton J. Young Fahrendorf, Viloria, Oliphant & Oster, LLP Doyle Law Office, PLLC Washoe District Court Clerk 'While petitioners titled their petition a "petition for writ of mandamus or prohibition & protective notice of appeal," notices of appeal must be filed in the district court. NRAP 3(a)(1). SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA 2 (0) 1947A ce/Plm
Document Info
Docket Number: 67114
Filed Date: 4/17/2015
Precedential Status: Non-Precedential
Modified Date: 4/18/2021