Regional Transp. Comm'n. of S. Nev. v. Dist. Ct. (Wang) ( 2015 )

 persuaded that petitioners have met their burden to demonstrate that our
extraordinary discretionary intervention is warranted. NRS 34.160; NRS
34.320; Pan v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court, 120 Nev. 222, 228, 88 P.3d 840,
844 (2004); Smith v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court, 107 Nev. 674, 677, 679,
818 P.2d 849, 851, 853 (1991); see also Smith v. Eighth Judicial Dist.
Court, 113 Nev. 1343, 1344, 950 P.2d 280, 281 (1997) (noting that this
court generally will not consider writ petitions challenging orders denying
motions to dismiss). Accordingly, we
ORDER the petition DENIED.
,C.J.
Hardesty
J.
Douglas
cc: Hon. Joanna Kishner, District Judge
Bremer Whyte Brown & O'Meara, LLP
Clark County District Attorney/Civil Division
Mainor Wirth
G. Dallas Horton & Associates
Henness & Haight
Edward M. Bernstein & Associates/Las Vegas
Callister & Associates
Golightly & Vannah, PLLC
Eighth District Court Clerk
SUPREME COURT
OF
NEVADA
2
(0) 1947A