Helfrich v. Vitto ( 2022 )

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
PETER JASON HELFRICH, No. 84388
Petitioner,
Fi 1 r
vs. tar
KIRK VITTO; AND THE STATE OF
NEVADA,
Res s ondents.
ORDER DENYING PETITION
This is an original pro se petition for a writ of mandamus that
would direct respondents to act in a federal case. Having considered the
petition, we are not persuaded that our extraordinary and discretionary
intervention is warranted. Pan u. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court, 120 Nev.
222, 228, 88 P.3d 840, 844 (2004); Smith v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court, 107
Nev. 674, 677, 679, 818 P.2d 849, 851, 853 (1991). Additionally, we decline
to intervene because petitioner failed to submit an adequate appendix for
our review. See NRS 34.160; NRAP 21(a)(4). Accordingly, we
ORDER the petition DENIED.'
Parraguirre
J.
Hardesty
J.
Stiglich
1 We further decline to address the notice petitioner filed on March
16, 2022, as our decision renders it moot.
SUPREME COURT
OF
NEVADA
(0) I q47A
— t2_616
ce: Peter Jason Helfrich
Attorney General/Carson City
SUPREME COURT
OF
NEVADA
2
KO 1947A argig0