State v. Melanson ( 1923 )

Snow, J.

The question raised by the state’s exception is answered by the conclusion reached in State v. Nadeau, post, 183. The question whether the specially constructed compartment, as distinguished from the vehicle, was a cask, bottle, case or container within the meaning of s. 10 [57], is not presented and has not been considered.

Exception overruled.

Young, J., dissented: the others concurred.