Matthison v. Payne , 99 N.J.L. 285 ( 1923 )

Per Curiam.

The judgment under review herein should he affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Kaliseh in the Supreme Court.

For affirmance — The Chancellor, Trenchard, Bergen, Minturn, Black, Katzenbacii, White, Heppenheimer, Ackerson, Van Buskirk, JJ. 10.

For reversal — None.