-
The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Heher in the Supreme Court.
For affirmance — THE CHANCELLOR, PARKER, LLOYD, CASE, BODINE, DONGES, PERSKIE, VAN BUSKIRK, KAYS, HETFIELD, DEAR, WELLS, JJ. 12.
For reversal — None. *Page 274
Document Info
Citation Numbers: 176 A. 341, 114 N.J.L. 273, 1935 N.J. LEXIS 226
Judges: PER CURIAM.
Filed Date: 1/10/1935
Precedential Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 4/15/2017