-
Per Curiam. The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Chief Justice Brogan in the Supreme Court.
For affirmance —The Chancellor, Case, Bodine, Donges, Heher, Perskie, Colie, Dear, Wells, Rafferty, Hague, Thompson, JJ. 12.
For reversal —None.
Document Info
Citation Numbers: 129 N.J.L. 386, 30 A.2d 27, 1943 N.J. LEXIS 189
Judges: PER CURIAM.
Filed Date: 1/22/1943
Precedential Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 10/19/2024