Arnold v. Hamilton Investment Co., Inc. , 132 N.J.L. 419 ( 1945 )


Menu:
  • Per Curiam.

    The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Colie in the Supreme Court.

    For affirmance — The Chancellor, Chibe Justice, Case, Bobine, Donges, Peeskie, Porter, Wells, Rabeerty, Hague, Thompson, Dill, JJ. 12.

    For reversal — None.

Document Info

Citation Numbers: 40 A.2d 649, 132 N.J.L. 419, 1945 N.J. LEXIS 178

Judges: PER CURIAM.

Filed Date: 1/4/1945

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 11/11/2024