Femia v. City of Bayonne , 112 N.J.L. 90 ( 1934 )

Pee Curiam.

The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered in the Supreme Court.

For affirmance — The Chancellor, Parker, Lloyd, Bodine, Donges, Heher, Perskie, Van Buskirk, Kays, Heteield, Dear, Wells^ Dill, JJ. 13.

For reversal — None.