Sevebeck v. Peck , 127 N.J.L. 563 ( 1942 )

Per Curiam.

The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Donges in the Supreme Court.

For affirmance — The Chancelloe, Chief Justice, Case, Bodine, Hehee, Perskie, Porter, Dear, Wells, WolfsKeil, Hague, Thompson, JJ. 12.

For reversal — None.