Katz v. Willner , 103 N.J.L. 698 ( 1927 )

Per Curiam.

The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by the Supreme Court.

For affirmance — The Chancellor, Chief Justice, Trenchard, Kalisch, Katzenbach, Lloyd, Van Buskirk, McGlennon, Kays, Hetfield, Dear, JJ. 11.

For reversal — None.