Wasserman v. Schwartz ( 1943 )

Per Curiam.

The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Parker in the Supreme Court.

For affirmance — The Chancellor, Donges,' Perskie, Dear, Wells, Raffeety, JJ. 6.

For reversal — Case, Bodine, Heher, JJ.1 3.

. For modification — Thompson, J. 1.